Well got a problem with the draft name:
draft-moskowitz-intarea-schc-internet-protocol-number-00
this is 53 char long and the limit is 50.
What to cut out for the individual submission. This will work as a wg
name (r/moskowitz/ietf/)
BTW, the xml2rfc script has no problems with this. Only tools/submit barfs.
On 9/6/22 17:08, Bob Hinden wrote:
Bob,
inline
On Sep 6, 2022, at 10:06 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm-i...@htt-consult.com> wrote:
Bob H.,
thanks for the review!
I am using:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml
For my source information.
I abbreviated "Internet Protocol Number" as "IP Number". Is there a more
accepted abbreviation?
Or do I always use the full term? This applies to the draft name and title
abbreviation.
I think using the full name would be better. Or “IP Protocol Number” or
“Protocol Number” if it needs to be abbreviated.
This is an interesting question as this is the Number in the IP Header for the
enveloped protocol...
Right, it is the number used to identify the protocol of the next header (to
use the IPv6 terminology) that follows the IP header.
As for # 144, I follow guidelines I have received elsewhere for write with a
TBD and recommended value; I have had IANA review of those drafts and they work
with this usage. I see now that 144 was recently assigned, so my next draft
will recommend 145.
I figured as much. Or just leave it as TBD, unless you care about what number
is assigned.
I look forward to your response, then I will push out a new ver.
Hope this is helpful.
Bob M. (are there as many 'Bobs' as "Steves" here ;) )
:-)
Bob
On 9/6/22 11:30, Bob Hinden wrote:
Bob,
Once there is an adoption call, I will support it.
I did a quick read of the draft and have a few suggestions, mostly editorial.
Please be careful with the terminology. The registry where you are asking for an
assignment is called “Internet Protocol Numbers”. I was confused by the use of
"IP Number”, that isn’t a thing. I suggest making the draft consistent on the
name of the field, specifically always use “protocol” in the name.
The draft requests the assignment of 144 from the IANA registry. I looked at
the registry, this value is currently assigned to:
144 AGGFRAG AGGFRAG encapsulation payload for ESP (TEMPORARY -
registered 2022-08-26,
document sent to IESG Evaluation 2022-07-14)
[draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-18]
Suggest leaving this as just TBD.
Bob
On Sep 6, 2022, at 6:32 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm-i...@htt-consult.com> wrote:
As was discussed at the INTAREA meeting at IETF 114,
I request that a call for WG adoption of this draft.
There is a lot of work which will cascade in other areas once this is one its
way.
I am open to draft name change. I really SHOULD have called it something like:
draft-moskowitz-intarea-schc-ipnumber
thanks
Bob
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
