Bob, Once there is an adoption call, I will support it.
I did a quick read of the draft and have a few suggestions, mostly editorial.
Please be careful with the terminology. The registry where you are asking for
an assignment is called “Internet Protocol Numbers”. I was confused by the
use of "IP Number”, that isn’t a thing. I suggest making the draft consistent
on the name of the field, specifically always use “protocol” in the name.
The draft requests the assignment of 144 from the IANA registry. I looked at
the registry, this value is currently assigned to:
144 AGGFRAG AGGFRAG encapsulation payload for ESP (TEMPORARY -
registered 2022-08-26,
document sent to IESG Evaluation 2022-07-14)
[draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-18]
Suggest leaving this as just TBD.
Bob
> On Sep 6, 2022, at 6:32 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm-i...@htt-consult.com> wrote:
>
>
> As was discussed at the INTAREA meeting at IETF 114,
>
> I request that a call for WG adoption of this draft.
>
> There is a lot of work which will cascade in other areas once this is one its
> way.
>
> I am open to draft name change. I really SHOULD have called it something
> like:
>
> draft-moskowitz-intarea-schc-ipnumber
>
> thanks
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
