> The addressing related point here is IMHO the RFC 6115 definition for > identifiers may be more suitable for drone uses than the LISP-MN proposal > treats EIDs: drones must carry static identifiers for authentication of > control handover, while the EID assignment in the proposal reads to me as > slightly more dynamic (though not as dynamic as RLOC assignment).
It can be dynamic but encouraged to be static, and simpler for management that way. Dino _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
