> On Mar 7, 2022, at 4:18 AM, Jens Finkhaeuser <j...@interpeer.io> wrote: > > Different sections of the draft claim different things; some claim EIDs never > change, others talk about multiple EIDs used in different scenarios. I find > section 5.1 interesting: "It is anticipated that these EIDs will change > infrequently if at all, since the assignment of a LISP-MN's EID is envisioned > to be a subscription time event." > > Subscription is an undefined term that also appears in LISP+ALT. In the > context of drones (not to bombard you with terminology from that area), one > could imagine that subscription occurs when loading a mission plan onto a > drone prior to departure. But by definition, this then only entails > anticipated scenarios, not emergency response situations.
"Subscription time" means the mobile-node manufacture assigns an EID like it would a IMEI. Then it never changes. > A completely static drone identifier is one thing; EIDs changing rarely is > another. Drones may require communications with isolated, private networks, > which are outside the scope of LISP+ALT - how subscription should be > interpreted here is an interesting topic! EIDs need to be unique *within* a mapping system. So you can have multiple mapping systems that use, say 240.0.0.0/4 (for IPv4 EIDs), for static assignment, where the low-order 3 bytes is a random number generated and verify from the mapping system the node uses to be unique. Dino _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area