> The IAB feels that this is unfortunate, and that the transition to > IPv6 would be an ideal occasion to provide upper layer end-to-end > protocols with temporally unique identifiers. The exact nature of > these identifiers requires further study."
So if the IAB, or the community at large, feels that overlays cannot or should not solve this problem, then let's just go with 8+8, per Mike O'Dell, and move on. So what I mean is, lets make a decision. We have been filibustering this for 20 years. I believe there is code in kernels for transport protocols to transport checksum on the low-order 64 bits. Dino _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
