Thank you to Westin Harris and Hartmut Buescher who offlist both pointed me to Harunaga Isaacson and
Francesco Sferra's edition of the Sekanirdeśa of Maitreyanātha. To Peter Pasedach who also offlist pointed me to Michael Hahn's edition of the Kapphiṇābhyudaya. Matthew Kapstein who provided a archive.org link to Nilratan Sen's facsimile edition of a caryāgitikoṣa manuscript (which had the manuscript page photograph and transcription on the same page). And to Heike Oberlin who pointed to the on-line transcription of the Bhasa projects cārudatta based on multiple manuscripts (very very impressive!!) Why I asked the question. Dominik Wujastyk had suggested as best practice for transcribing a manuscript. In transcribing a manuscript it is best practice to transcribe diplomatically exactly what the MS says. A second, separate file may be prepared that contains various normalisations, like ba/va or śa/sa, rma/rmma, etc. But Phillip Maas pointed out: Determining “exactly what the MS says” may sometimes be a less straightforward task than it may seem. Frequently, transcribing requires interpreting So it seemed to me (at least for on-line transcriptions ) that the best solution was to simply include a copy of the manuscript and a normalized (or non-normalized) transcription of it. My understanding is that photographs of 2 dimensional objects can't be copyrighted, so the only thing preventing this would be contractual obligations (such as with NGMCP manuscripts). Presumably any qualified person using the manuscript for an edition would know the script the manuscript was written in (devanagari, grantha, Śāradā etc.) so he/she could accept or reject any normalizations etc. Thanks, Harry Spier On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 1:53 PM Heike Oberlin < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Harry, > > Here is another example, taken from the former Bhāsa project (Tübingen & > Würzburg) – probably not the latest programming, but it has worked for > years: > https://www.bhasa.indologie.uni-wuerzburg.de/rahmen.html > [For more information refer to my article from 2012: »From Palmleaves to a > Multimedia Databank – A Note on the ›Bhāsa-Project‹«. In: *Aspects of > Manuscript Culture in South India*. Ed. by Saraju Rath. Leiden: Brill > 2012 (Brill’s Indological Library, 40), p. 139-155 and Plates VI-IX.] > > Click on „Cārudatta“; there on the blue numbers in square brackets – this > links the text passage to the respective palm leaf manuscript(s): leaf > number, recto/verso, line. > Each work is linked to an overall word-index of the plays entered in the > database. > > More information on programming: Matthias Ahlborn ( > [email protected]). > > For the book edition (Esposito, Anna Aurelia: *Cārudatta. Ein indisches > Schauspiel. Kritische Edition und Übersetzung mit einer Studie des Prakrits > der 'Trivandrum-Dramen'. *Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz 2004) contact: > [email protected]. > > Best, > Heike > > -------------------- > *Prof. Dr. Heike Oberlin* > Dept. of Indology · University of Tuebingen > Nauklerstr. 35 (room 3.07) · 72074 Tuebingen · Germany > phone 07071 29-74005 · mobile 0176 20030066 · > [email protected] > * https://uni-tuebingen.de/en/9974 <https://uni-tuebingen.de/en/9974>* > > > > > Am 13.04.2023 um 17:55 schrieb Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY < > [email protected]>: > > Dear Harry, > > Here’s one example. The are several others in Buddhist studies that also > come to mind. > > https://archive.org/details/caryagitikosa > > Matthew > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 15:03, Harry Spier via INDOLOGY < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Dear list members, > Has anyone included photographs of the original manuscripts with their > on-line or off-line editions of a sanskrit text, or know if someone has > done this? > Thanks, > Harry Spier > > > _______________________________________________ > INDOLOGY mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology > > >
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
