On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Peter Tribble <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Jacob Ritorto <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Over on ZFS-Discuss we've uncovered some disturbing news: >> http://www.sun.com/service/eosl/eosl_opensolaris.html >> >> Anyone know why they're randomly killing off OpenSolaris? Seriously? >> Should I be looking for a new job now? > > What do you read in this page that suggests that OpenSolaris is being > killed off, or that the support levels have in any way been changed? > > Looks to me like that page was written just over 6 months ago, promising > 6 months support at the GA level, 2+1/2 years at the EOV level (which is > where we are now) and 2 further years extended support. With a 6 month > release schedule, the expectation would be that there's a new release > coming out at the time GA support moves to the next phase, with a total of > 5 years support. The only interesting thing is that the page I'm looking at > hasn't been updated to move 2009.06 out of the GA phase, which the > timetable says should have been done a couple of months back. > > Such statements of expectations for support level over time apply to all > products as a matter of course. > > -- > -Peter
If that's the case, is there also an eosl page for Solaris 10 ? _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
