Dennis Clarke 写道: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:17 AM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 8/07/2008, at 11:53 AM, MC wrote: >> >> >>>> OpenSolaris 2008.5 is downright broken as a development platform >>>> >>> If someone outside this list is saying that (they are) then people >>> here should be listening. >>> >>> I suggest a package that reconfigures the system as a development >>> platform, and an iso that comes as a development platform by >>> default. Swap some of the office productivity apps for software >>> development apps. This is the CD I would give university students... >>> >> So I'd appreciate any thoughts you have in terms of 'development >> platform' - do you mean C, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, C#, C++? Or web >> developer - Rails, Django, PHP, Javascript, ...? What about compilers >> and IDEs? Which ones? Would you include system headers, or application/ >> web servers? >> > > whoa .. whoa .. slow down. I can't read that much in a single breath :-) > > >> I'm not disagreeing with you in any way, just curious as to what you >> take on it is. What I'd rather see is us do a really good job as you >> say about packaging up specific sets of developer platforms, and make >> it really easy *initially* to download those from the repositories. >> > > How about a second CD image for all that goodness and then *also* keep > it all in the repo too. > >
It reminds me that once Solaris came with several CDs: one base(or core), one Language, one Compaign, one Office, etc. Even Linux went the same way. Then DVD appears. -Alex _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
