David Orman wrote: > I'm not arguing it should be there already, I'm simply arguing we > should strive to get there in the future - and updated ISOs would > allow people earlier access to the fixed bits. :) That's fine. I'll upgrade. I need the practice. :) > As to your second point, required reading of mailing lists to update > an OS is beyond the "average" person. I understand where you are > coming from (and agree, OSOL isn't ready for the "average" person yet) > - but my argument wasn't made to apply only to the current state - > more towards the future. Ah, I see, ok. And I do think we'll get there faster than we realize.
Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/ _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
