On 8/07/2008, at 5:56 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
>> So I'd appreciate any thoughts you have in terms of 'development
>> platform' - do you mean C, Java, Perl, Python, Ruby, C#, C++? Or web
>> developer - Rails, Django, PHP, Javascript, ...? What about compilers
>> and IDEs? Which ones? Would you include system headers, or  
>> application/
>> web servers?
>>
>
> SXCE has most of that already.  I'll have to google Django to figure  
> out
> what it is, but the rest is already there (ok, maybe not C#...)   
> ~2.7 GBytes
> for b93.  I don't think we are far off... at least in the technical  
> aspects.

I'll almost certain that we're not far off too - we just need to walk  
the last mile, to make installation, and configuration a breeze.

For example, I want to be able to install rails. It shouldn't be any  
more simpler than -

pfexec pkg install ruby-rails

This grabs ruby, rails, associate dependencies and chooses, say, mysql

A simple

rails /path/to/project

and

/path/to/project/scripts/server

should result in a nice rails page on http://localhost:3000. Anything  
more complicated that goes out of bounds from the current set of  
tutorials for rails is insufficient. I have no doubt there are some  
fine points to be determined about the interaction of gem here. But  
it's got to be simple, and it's *got* to be the first result from a  
quick Google search. Same for Django, Drupal, etc..

Let the users get on and do what they want to do - let's not get in  
the way. But at this point, I bet I'm preaching to the crowd.


Glynn
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to