> > supports is better memory management?
> Last time i checked, MySQL didn't hav any built in caching algorithm. That
> was 3.22.xx version series. For disk caching MySQL depends on the OS, and
Was in their todo list in last year, should be done by now.
So using OS cache is not as good as having you own mechanism?
> shud try is to use the innodb table sets. They are faster by a big margin.
> The built in ISAM and myISAM tables are not as fast as the innodb tables.
hmm...could be. First time I heard this term "innodb".
> MySQL is extremely fast for things like username lookup, and other simple
> table lookup/insert operations.
and apart from sub-queries, where else is oracle faster ?
================================================
To subscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subscribe in subject header
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in subject header
Archives are available at http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd%40wpaa.org
=================================================
