ietf  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database" John C Klensin
  • Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database" SM
  • Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database" Tony Hansen
  • Re: Call for Review of draft-rfced-rfcxx00-retired, "List of Internet Official Protocol Standards: Replaced by an Online Database" Pete Resnick
• cbor-05 (was: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt> (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard) Carsten Bormann
  • High-volume benchmark (was Re: [apps-discuss] cbor-05) Pierre Thierry
  • Re: High-volume benchmark (was Re: [apps-discuss] cbor-05) Carsten Bormann
• RE: RFC 6980 on Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Stephen Nadas
• Last Call: <draft-petithuguenin-behave-turn-uris-05.txt> (Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers) to Proposed Graham Klyne
• Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Graham Klyne
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard S Moonesamy
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Graham Klyne
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Graham Klyne
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Graham Klyne
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Peter Saint-Andre
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Harald Alvestrand
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-nandakumar-rtcweb-stun-uri-05.txt> (URI Scheme for Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) Protocol) to Proposed Standard Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher IETF Administrative Director
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Riccardo Bernardini
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Melinda Shore
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Ted Lemon
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher John Levine
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher John Levine
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Riccardo Bernardini
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Ted Lemon
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFCPublisher t . p .
  • Re: [rfc-i] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Ray Pelletier
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Ray Pelletier
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Sandy Ginoza
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Stephen Farrell
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher David Harrington
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Jeffrey Hutzelman
  • Re: [IAOC] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Russ Housley
  • Re: [rfc-i] [IAOC] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Nico Williams
  • Re: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Bert Wijnen (IETF)
  • Re: [IAB] Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Eliot Lear
  • RE: Community Input Sought on SOWs for RFC Production Center and RFC Publisher Adrian Farrel
• NOMS 2014 Call for Papers Thomas Nadeau
• Data collection for remote participation Vinayak Hegde
  • Re: Data collection for remote participation Janet P Gunn
  • Re: Data collection for remote participation Vinayak Hegde
  • Re: Data collection for remote participation Janet P Gunn
  • Re: Data collection for remote participation John Leslie
  • Radical Solution for remote participants Douglas Otis
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Dave Cridland
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants John Leslie
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants John C Klensin
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Arturo Servin
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Janet P Gunn
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Janet P Gunn
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Joel M. Halpern
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants John C Klensin
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Keith Moore
  • Re: Radical Solution for remote participants Andy Bierman
  • Charging remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Charging remote participants Janet P Gunn
  • Re: Charging remote participants Keith Moore
  • Re: Charging remote participants Turchanyi Geza
  • Re: Charging remote participants Arturo Servin
  • Re: Charging remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Charging remote participants Keith Moore
  • Re: Charging remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) SM
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) Vinayak Hegde
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) John C Klensin
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) John Levine
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) SM
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) John C Klensin
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) SM
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) John C Klensin
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) Scott Kitterman
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) Scott Kitterman
  • Re: Academic and open source rate (was: Charging remote participants) Vinayak Hegde
  • Re: Academic and open source rate Arturo Servin
  • Re: Academic and open source rate SM
  • Re: Academic and open source rate Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: Charging remote participants Carlos M. Martinez
  • Re: Charging remote participants John C Klensin
  • Re: Charging remote participants Melinda Shore
  • Re: Charging remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Charging remote participants Henning Schulzrinne
  • Re: Charging remote participants Mark Baugher (mbaugher)
  • Re: Charging remote participants Henning Schulzrinne
  • Re: Charging remote participants Stephen Farrell
  • Re: Charging remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Charging remote participants John C Klensin
  • Re: Charging remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Charging remote participants David Morris
  • Re: Charging remote participants Janet P Gunn
  • Re: Charging remote participants Dave Crocker
  • Re: Charging remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Charging remote participants Abdussalam Baryun
  • Re: Charging remote participants Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: Charging remote participants Janet P Gunn
  • Re: Charging remote participants Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: Charging remote participants Dave Aronson
  • Re: Charging remote participants Randy Presuhn
  • Re: Charging remote participants Janet P Gunn
  • Re: Charging remote participants Janet P Gunn
  • Re: Charging remote participants Arturo Servin
  • Re: Data collection for remote participation Alejandro Acosta
  • Re: Data collection for remote participation Vinayak Hegde
  • Re: Data collection for remote participation Alejandro Acosta
  • Re: Data collection for remote participation S Moonesamy
  • Re: Charging remote participants Scott Kitterman
• Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-05 Peter Yee
• Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard Yaron Sheffer
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard Carsten Bormann
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard Dave Crocker
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard Ted Lemon
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard John C Klensin
  • Re: Last Call: <draft-bormann-cbor-04.txt (Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)) to Proposed Standard Eliot Lear
• TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Martin Sustrik
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Wesley Eddy
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Martin Sustrik
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Joe Touch
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Wesley Eddy
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Martin Sustrik
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Joe Touch
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Martin Sustrik
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Joe Touch
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Martin Sustrik
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Joe Touch
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Martin Sustrik
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Joe Touch
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Martin Sustrik
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Joe Touch
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Joe Touch
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Bob Braden
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Martin Sustrik
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Martin Sustrik
  • Re: TCPMUX (RFC 1078) status Joe Touch
• Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08 Black, David
  • Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08 Jari Arkko
  • Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08 Sam Hartman
  • RE: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08 Black, David
  • Re: [karp] IANA policy for draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08 Carter Bullard
  • Re: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08 Sam Hartman
  • Re: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08 Stephen Kent
  • RE: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08 Uma Chunduri
  • RE: [karp] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-karp-crypto-key-table-08 Black, David
• Gen-ART review of draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-04 Black, David
• Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04 Carsten Bormann
  • Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04 Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04 Tony Finch
  • Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04 Carsten Bormann
  • Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04 Paul Hoffman
  • Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04 Carsten Bormann
  • Re: [apps-discuss] Gen-ART review of draft-bormann-cbor-04 Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Models of building platform standards Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [TLS] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oob-pubkey-09.txt> (Out-of-Band Public Key Validation for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard Alexey Melnikov
• Microphone protocol Marc Petit-Huguenin
• Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility Aaron Yi DING
  • Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility Joe Abley
  • Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility Melinda Shore
  • Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility Keith Moore
  • Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility Doug Barton
• Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement Noel Chiappa
  • Re: [Trustees] The Trust Agreement Brian E Carpenter
• Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid-10 Roni Even
  • RE: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-allen-dispatch-imei-urn-as-instanceid-10 Andrew Allen
• Re: procedural question with remote participation Aaron Yi DING
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Aaron Yi DING
  • Re: [87attendees] procedural question with remote participation Spencer Dawkins at IETF
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Aaron Yi DING
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Aaron Yi DING
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Michael Richardson
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Joe Abley
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Eliot Lear
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Douglas Otis
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Hadriel Kaplan
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Joe Abley
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Aaron Yi DING
  • Re: procedural question with remote participation Joe Abley
• Speaking of VAT John Levine
  • Re: Speaking of VAT Yoav Nir
  • Re: Speaking of VAT John R Levine
  • Re: Speaking of VAT Ray Pelletier
  • Re: Speaking of VAT t . p .
  • Re: Speaking of VAT John Levine
  • Re: Speaking of VAT Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
  • Re: Speaking of VAT Carsten Bormann
  • Re: Speaking of VAT Ray Pelletier
• RPS Accessibility Paul Aitken
  • Re: RPS Accessibility spromano
  • Re: [iaoc-rps] RPS Accessibility Dan York

• Earlier messages
• Later messages