Riccardo All of the DOC files are in the process of being replaced with PDF files.
I apologize for the inconvenience and angst this caused. Ray On Aug 13, 2013, at 3:36 AM, Riccardo Bernardini wrote: > Is this the document with the proposed SOW? > > http://iaoc.ietf.org/documents/RPC-Proposed-SoW-2013-final.doc > > I know that I should not this, but... I am a bit surprised > (disappointed) in seeing a proprietary format used here. I am not > saying that you should not use the Office suite to write it, but you > could convert it to PDF (better, PDF/A) before publishing it. > > Anyway, I use Linux, so I guess I will not be able to give my input about it. > > Best regards, > > Riccardo > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, IETF Administrative Director > <i...@ietf.org> wrote: >> The RFC Series Editor (RSE) is proposing changes to the Statements of Work >> (SOW) for the RFC >> Production Center (RPC) and the RFC Publisher. The IAOC wants to receive >> community input prior to >> negotiating the proposed changes with the contractor. Community input will >> be discussed with the RSE >> prior to negotiations and reviewed by the IAOC. >> >> In forwarding the proposed Statements of Work the RSE said: "The changes >> seek to make the SoWs >> more current [implementing RFC 6635] and specific, correcting the issues of >> "multiple masters" >> directing the RPC and Publisher, as well as preparing the way for a more >> significant revision to the SoWs >> when the RFC Format changes are operationalized. The SoWs have also been >> reviewed and supported >> by the RSOC [RFC Series Oversight Committee]. We consider the changes >> within the SoWs critical to the >> clear function of the RPC and Publisher, but suggest that the changes do not >> imply a significant change >> in responsibility for the RPC or Publisher." >> >> The proposed SOWs, the current SOWs and a diff file for each can be found >> here under Community >> Review: <http://iaoc.ietf.org/rfps.html> >> >> We appreciate the community's input and look forward to hearing from you. >> >> Thanks >> >> Ray Pelletier >> IAD > _______________________________________________ > rfc-interest mailing list > rfc-inter...@rfc-editor.org > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
