On Friday, March 02, 2012 06:43:32 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Scott Kitterman Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 7:23 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-08.txt> (SPF > > Authentication Failure Reporting using the Abuse Report Format) to > > Proposed Standard > > > > Based on that, I think that the sentence in paragraph 6 could be lost > > without losing anything important, so I think it should stay as it is. > > Yes, I suggest that the sentence that comprises Section 6 proper can be > dropped. The text currently in 6.1 can be moved up to 6, and the current > 6.1 thus removed.
Done in my local copy. > > It might be worth someone looking at > > draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-10 again to see if that's really > > appropriate. > > I'll take a second look. Thanks. Scott K _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
