At 11:14 01-03-2012, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Would "ADMD" and an informative reference to RFC5598 be more appropriate?
There exist cases in which the administrator of domain name employing
[SPF] for announcing sending practices may want to know when messages are
received via unauthorized routing.
A number of registries are using this wording already and there's
been no objection to date. Do you have a better suggestion?
It's not an objection. The comments were labelled as editorial.
draft-nottingham-appsawg-happiana-00 contains some suggestions.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
