On Thursday, March 01, 2012 04:01:20 PM Barry Leiba wrote: ... > >> In Section 6: > >> > >> "Security issues with respect to these reports are similar to those > >> found in [DSN]." > >> > >> The reference to DSN could be normative. > > > > Security Considerations are never normative, so I'm not sure I agree > > that this should be. > It should. Just because the Security Considerations section doesn't > usually use normative language doesn't mean that it's not normative. > People reading the document and implementing the protocol certainly > have to read and understand the Security Considerations section, along > with any transitive sections in other documents.
The reason I didn't make it normative when I drafted that section is because this isn't a DSN, it's an ARF, thus the similar to. If people think it should be normative, I think it's fine to change it. Scott K _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
