----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Andrews" <[email protected]> To: "Ofer Inbar" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 12:37 AM
> The point of the article was to make more people aware of IPv6 and to > urge them actually start planning to move to IPv6. > > I've got IPv6 at home today (tunneled). If my ISP moves to CGN > without also enabling native IPv6 I will loose my IPv6. That would > be going backwards. > > For the client side there is no downside in enabling IPv6 today. Recently I set up a new account with the incumbent ISP and asked their sales department (several times) about IPv6 support. Their reply was odd, and I eventually found that the translation was 'you have mentioned something we have had no training in so this is our stock response.' This persisted even when I got into second and third level support, so there are big ISP out there who have not yet heard of IPv6. We have a long way to go and not much time to go it in. Tom Petch > > Mark > > > > You can find Daniel's recent talk at http://www.ipv6.ie/summit2010/. > > > > I can find a link to his talk on that site, but each time I click on > > that link I get a quickly-broken TCP connection. Overloaded, perhaps? > > -- Cos > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
