This I can agree with, the next question that
naturally follows then is is WAP the right protocol
for a fixed wireless application, or are we talking
about yet another set of standards and protocols. I
would tend to
think that one set should work for both.
Regards, Alan
--- John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan Simpkins wrote:
>
> > For some countries it
> > is more feasible for people to use mobile
> technology
>
> But better still is fixed-wireless, which can
> deliver bandwidth
> more cheaply, because you have more predictable
> signal
> conditions. Unless you're talking about nomadic
> headers getting
> online out in the Sahara--in which case, development
> money would
> be better spent on, say, reforestation.
>
> --
>
/=================================================================\
> |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions
> are my own. |
> |Chief Scientist
> |================================================|
> |eCal Corp. |"How quietly do you think we can
> nail these back|
> |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|in?" --Calvin
> |
>
\=================================================================/
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
