Alan Simpkins wrote: > For some countries it > is more feasible for people to use mobile technology But better still is fixed-wireless, which can deliver bandwidth more cheaply, because you have more predictable signal conditions. Unless you're talking about nomadic headers getting online out in the Sahara--in which case, development money would be better spent on, say, reforestation. -- /=================================================================\ |John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. | |Chief Scientist |================================================| |eCal Corp. |"How quietly do you think we can nail these back| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]|in?" --Calvin | \=================================================================/
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Gilbert Cattoire
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... John Stracke
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Robert Elz
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Alan Simpkins
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... John Stracke
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Anthony Atkielski
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Alan Simpkins
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... John Stracke
- RE: WAP - What A Problem... Brijesh Kumar
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Eric Brunner
- RE: WAP - What A Problem... Erkki Kolehmainen
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Alan Simpkins
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: WAP - What A Problem... Anthony Atkielski