I would tend to disagree, working for a
communications
company that specializes in working with
multinationals
and dealing with the associated infrastrucures in
foriegn countries I have found that in many countries
it is not financially feasible, nor geagraphically
feasible to try to create the kind of communications
infrastructure in place that we enjoy in some of the
more industrialized countries. For some countries it
is more feasible for people to use mobile technology
than to try to put in place the fiber, and copper
necessary to allow them to communicate using some of
what might be called the more traditional methods.
WAP, and mobile technology is a necessary component to
the future of the global economy.
Regards, Alan
--- Anthony Atkielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand why so much effort is expended on
> things like WAP when
> 99% of the real world still doesn't have any access
> at all to the Internet,
> much less wireless access. And even of those who
> do, most have such slow
> connections that even download a simple test page is
> an ordeal.
>
> I know it's not very sexy to drop the blue-sky toys,
> but doesn't anyone ever
> work on improving and democratizing existing
> infrastructure instead of
> widening the gap between what people really have and
> what looks cool in the
> lab?
>
> -- Anthony
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Crowcroft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'IETF Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 09:10
> Subject: Re: WAP - What A Problem...
>
>
> >
> > a technical discussion worth reading is at
> >
>
http://www.osopinion.com/Opinions/MikeBanahan/MikeBanahan1.html
> >
> > it would seeem (as i've suspected for a while)
> that the community in
> > charge of this development has the same problem as
> the guy who built
> > jurassic park - they haev no discipline, or
> understanding of computing
> > and the software/jhardware interface tradeoffs -
> this is qutie a
> > common problem in communications work - people
> come from one side of
> > the tracks (either jsut software or just
> engineering, or ust plain
> > theory) - systems architecture is hard stuff, but
> there is little
> > point standing on the toes of giants, when its
> possible to stand on
> > their shoulders....it both ends of the problem
> space, whether
> > application level and devising new markup
> languages for restricted
> > display, or low level work in customising
> > protocol stacks for resource scarce environments
> , there is a body of
> > public work out there, and of researchers who are
> willing to
> > cosntructively critique proposals provided they
> are carried out in a
> > public way with optimally zero cost for access to
> early drafts, but
> > at least low entry cost - it is also a good idea
> to let those wacky
> > media lab types get their hands on hardware
> prototypes, since they
> > will (as william gibson puts it) "find a street
> use for things" - its
> > instructive to see how wavelan and its cousins
> have fared so well
> > after being handed over to the ietf - if we'd have
> PCMCIA GSM and GPRS
> > (and bluetooth) cards, despite battery power or
> other clunkiness
> > problems, we might haev made less of a dogs dinner
> of things...(when i
> > say we, i mean the interdisciplinary, apparently
> unstructured, but
> > actually highly organised force that will fit
> anything to IP, and not
> > vice versa)
> >
> > give me a level long enough and we can moev the
> earth - give the wrong
> > end of the same level to the wrong people and they
> can crush a
> > diamond.
> >
> >
> > j.
> >
> >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
