Richard Shockey wrote:
> If we were looking at a typicial household and you wanted to plan for the
> future I would have to assume 1 address for every single thing plugged in
> to any thing, phone, electrical appliances, water, maybe even sewage. Yes
> an IP address on your toilet.
[...]
> Businesses are different but some of the needs are the same. The typical
> business customer has multiple devices at their command, many of which are
> currently IP addressable or certainly should be, phone, cell phone,
> printer, copier, fax, scanners, PDA's, cameras. 15 addressees per employee?
Maybe more--business needs would probably be almost a superset of home needs
(only major appliances I can think of that are in my home but not my office
are the washer and dryer). If the sewage utilities find it useful to monitor
toilets, they'll want to include businesses--they'll probably start with
businesses, in fact, which will be more amenable to price incentives.
--
/=================================================================\
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own. |
|Chief Scientist |================================================|
|eCal Corp. |"How can one conceive of a one party system in a|
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|country that has over 200 varieties of cheese?" |
| |--Charles de Gaulle |
\=================================================================/
