> > Most users are not > > networking geeks. They like NAT because NAT boxes make what they want > > to do so easy. > > presumably they don't realize that the NATs are making it hard > to do other things that they might want to do. > > I wonder...how many of these folks really want network address > translation, versus those who just want the other things that > NAT boxes often do? (DHCP, firewall, hub, router, all with > really easy setup) Bingo. Most don't even know what NAT is. They buy a box that does what they want with easy setup and sometimes never mentions NAT. (What they want doesn't include DHCP; they mostly don't know what that is either.) -- Dick St.Peters, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... vinton g. cerf
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicatio... Richard Shockey
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-compli... John Stracke
- How many IP addresses? Graham Klyne
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Mark Prior
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Bernard Aboba
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complicatio... Dick St.Peters
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-compli... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-co... Randy Bush
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-co... Dick St.Peters
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-co... Peter Johansson
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.tx... Brian Lloyd
- RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Ian King
- IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Jon Crowcroft
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Keith Moore
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? John Stracke
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Anthony Atkielski
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Keith Moore