> Are you claiming that because the DNS has been used to pound other things, > it is no longer any good for hammering (IP address) nails? hypothesis: the net dns traffic is not significantly more than the email traffic about the dns. <g> randy
- Re: To address or NAT to... Charles E. Perkins
- Re: To address or NAT to... Bill Fink
- Re: To address or NAT to... David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to... Peter Deutsch
- Re: To address or NAT to... Dave Crocker
- Re: To address or NAT to... Peter Deutsch
- Re: To address or NAT to... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: To address or NAT to... RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: To address or NAT to... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: To address or NAT to... Steve Deering
- Re: To address or NAT to... Randy Bush
- Re: To address or NAT to... David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to... Bill Manning
- Re: To address or NAT to add... Steve Deering
- DNS performance (Re: To address or NAT to... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: DNS performance (Re: To address o... Christian Huitema
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Jeffrey Altman
- Re: To address or NAT to address? David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: To address or NAT to address? Dan Kohn
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Keith Moore