Charlie, > DNS is supposed to be a way to resolve domain names into IP addresses. As a hammer is supposed to be a way to pound nails. However, when it is perceived that all you have is a hammer, it is amazing what begins to look like nails. > How else would one get an IP(v6) address from a domain name other > than by using DNS? Am I missing something here? Yes. The DNS has grown a bit from a simple lookup mechanism. Rgds, -drc
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Christian Huitema
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: To address or NAT to address? David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Yakov Rekhter
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Charles E. Perkins
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Christian Huitema
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Bill Fink
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Charles E. Perkins
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Bill Fink
- Re: To address or NAT to address? David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Peter Deutsch
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Dave Crocker
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Peter Deutsch
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: To address or NAT to address? RL 'Bob' Morgan
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Steve Deering
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Randy Bush
- Re: To address or NAT to address? David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Bill Manning