--- Matt Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems to me that we may be able to recapture some aspects of end-to-end > > transparency at the application level if addressing issues are focused on > > host FQDNs, rather than IP addresses. > > Forget about it. Many of the same folks doing NAT also do a > two-faced DNS which hides most of their names from the outside. So a > host inside such a site has no more idea of its global name than of > its global address. > > Its a different problem if you want to hide from outside access. That is independent of whether you use IP address or FQDN to label the host. regards, suresh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place. Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com
- Re: To address or NAT to... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: To address or NAT to... Steve Deering
- Re: To address or NAT to... Randy Bush
- Re: To address or NAT to... David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to... Bill Manning
- Re: To address or NAT to add... Steve Deering
- DNS performance (Re: To address or NAT to... Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: DNS performance (Re: To address o... Christian Huitema
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Jeffrey Altman
- Re: To address or NAT to address? David R. Conrad
- RE: To address or NAT to address? Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: To address or NAT to address? Dan Kohn
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Keith Moore
- RE: To address or NAT to address? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Walt Lazear