The chairs determine that consensus exists to adopt the document. When the notice from the datatracker arrives, the authors are invited to submit the renamed -00 document.
-MSK, for the chairs On Sun, May 24, 2026 at 10:24 AM Bron Gondwana <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree here, we have adopted other documents which we decided not to > progress as separate items later; it's not the end of the world to adopt a > document which we decide doesn't have enough novelty to publish separately. > > Bron. > > On Sat, May 23, 2026, at 21:13, John Levine wrote: > > It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> said: > >I remain skeptical that this document is needed. My understanding is that > >DKIM2 publishes keys in the DNS with a syntax identical to what DKIM does, > >except that some tags are being "retired" and thus will be ignored by DKIM > >implementations. > > You're right. I'd adopt this draft as a placeholder, with the > understanding > that if nothing changes we can fold it into the main document as you > suggest. > > I think there is some value in having a document we can point to for mail > industry people to tell them not to panic, the transition won't be all > that hard. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > -- > Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd / Fastmail US LLC > [email protected] > > >
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
