I agree here, we have adopted other documents which we decided not to progress as separate items later; it's not the end of the world to adopt a document which we decide doesn't have enough novelty to publish separately.
Bron. On Sat, May 23, 2026, at 21:13, John Levine wrote: > It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> said: > >I remain skeptical that this document is needed. My understanding is that > >DKIM2 publishes keys in the DNS with a syntax identical to what DKIM does, > >except that some tags are being "retired" and thus will be ignored by DKIM > >implementations. > > You're right. I'd adopt this draft as a placeholder, with the understanding > that if nothing changes we can fold it into the main document as you suggest. > > I think there is some value in having a document we can point to for mail > industry people to tell them not to panic, the transition won't be all > that hard. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd / Fastmail US LLC [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
