It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> said: >I remain skeptical that this document is needed. My understanding is that >DKIM2 publishes keys in the DNS with a syntax identical to what DKIM does, >except that some tags are being "retired" and thus will be ignored by DKIM >implementations.
You're right. I'd adopt this draft as a placeholder, with the understanding that if nothing changes we can fold it into the main document as you suggest. I think there is some value in having a document we can point to for mail industry people to tell them not to panic, the transition won't be all that hard. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
