Dave Crocker wrote in <8de533b1-b92b-4dff-a8e0-7aa8e739c...@bbiw.net>: |On 2/4/2025 2:43 PM, Wei Chuang wrote: |> Each originator or forwarder has to own the entire message that leaves |> its system | |Wei, thanks for the comments. | |If your above statement is true, then why is it necessary to do the |reversal?
To get rid of DMARC and ARC. At least potentially, at some later time. |Might note was meant to explore the potential for addition of abuse, but |this question goes to the nature of responsibility for handlers: | |Why doesn't one handler's taking responsibility eliminate the need to |worry about the predecessors. Because it is a black box, which does not offer the possibility to verify anything. You are arguing in an empty space that is contradicted by the reality of the existence of for example ARC. The question is not "why", but the question is "how": how to properly deal with the reality: the desire to automatize trust processing, and policy application. And: being able to bring in the human factor as an optional verifier into this automatism, isn't that a positive development by itself? --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) | |In Fall and Winter, feel "The Dropbear Bard"s pint(er). | |The banded bear |without a care, |Banged on himself for e'er and e'er | |Farewell, dear collar bear _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org
