On 10/30/2023 12:44 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
Dave Crocker wrote in
<e31d72cd-54a2-4304-b72f-f93c9726f...@gmail.com>:
|On 10/29/2023 1:51 PM, Jan Dušátko wrote:
|> In my opinion, the verifiability of the place and time of origin needs
|> to be addressed, which is one of the reasons to use DKIM:
|
|While I think I understand the basis for thinking that DKIM is relevant
|to that determination, it isn't. It's semantics have nothing at all to
|do with authenticating origination, nor certifying content. Note, for
|example, that there can be (and often is) multiple DKIM signatures,
|affixed at different time.
This is why it is so important that ARC makes headers directly
addressable in infrastructures that ignore the stack nature of
email.
1. I don't understand what you mean by "headers directly addressable in
infrastructures"
2. I am pretty sure ARC doesn't do that
3. I don't understand how your response is relevant to what I wrote.
4. I don't understand how that is relevant to the current working group
topic of a problem statement
|DKIM says the signer attests to having 'some' responsibility in
|'handling' the message. That is fundamentally different than what your
|text means.
Still the sheer size of "good enough" (tm) RSA is consumes space
and bandwidth, and, yes (do not laugh), electrical energy.
And pushes towards TCP for DNS
Is your response suppose to have something to do with my statement?
--
Dave Crocker
dcroc...@gmail.com
mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social
408.329.0791
Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
Information & Planning Coordinator
American Red Cross
dave.crock...@redcross.org
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
