It appears that Scott Kitterman <skl...@kitterman.com> said: >On October 27, 2023 2:56:30 PM UTC, "Murray S. Kucherawy" ><superu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>On Sun, Oct 1, 2023 at 1:50 AM Jan Dušátko <jan=40dusatko....@dmarc.ietf.org> >>wrote: >> >>> I would like to ask to consider the possibility of defining a DKIM >>> signature using Ed448. [...]
>My view is that more encryption algorithms are bad for interoperability. For >DKIM signing/verifying to work, senders >and verifiers need a common algorithm. More choices make this more complex to >achieve. > >We standardized ed25119 as a hedge against unknown vulnerability in RSA. ... Since we already have ed25519, why would we want ed448? If ed25519 is a ten ton steel door on our cardboard box, ed448 is a fifteen ton steel door. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
