On 10/29/2023 1:51 PM, Jan Dušátko wrote:
In my opinion, the verifiability of the place and time of origin needs to be addressed, which is one of the reasons to use DKIM:
While I think I understand the basis for thinking that DKIM is relevant to that determination, it isn't. It's semantics have nothing at all to do with authenticating origination, nor certifying content. Note, for example, that there can be (and often is) multiple DKIM signatures, affixed at different time.
DKIM says the signer attests to having 'some' responsibility in 'handling' the message. That is fundamentally different than what your text means.
d/ -- Dave Crocker dcroc...@gmail.com mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social 408.329.0791 Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter Information & Planning Coordinator American Red Cross dave.crock...@redcross.org _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
