On 8/4/2023 11:57 AM, Jim Fenton wrote:
On 4 Aug 2023, at 11:53, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 8/4/2023 11:39 AM, Jim Fenton wrote:
I’m even less clear on draft-chuang-mailing-list-modifications. Does it have to
do with the currently chartered work
... it will help to hear specifics, rather than your asking a generic question
that throws a burden of proof back on the document author, without providing
them any indication what criteria you are applying here or any detail about why
you think it not relevant.
I was not disagreeing with anything. I was asking a question. That’s all.
Jim, the document has text on the topic.
Constructive dialogue requires engaging with what has already been said.
So, for example, you engaged with my (mis)understanding of your note,
and you explained that you are not disagreeing. Fine.
What is needed now is to engage with the substance of the draft, which
already has text about relevance.
Again, it's fine if you think it insufficient, invalid, or the like, but
constructive dialogue requires that a question like yours start from the
substance already provided.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
