Am 15.09.2015 um 01:12 schrieb Romaneev Vasily: > Hello! Hi,
> Could you advise - what are best practice for passive checks with icinga2 ? > > Documentation recomends smnp traps. I'm not familiar with smnp traps as method for passive checks. > What is you real experience ? Any other recomendations ? For hosts which want to provide passive data to icinga2 we use nscaweb (ischluff fork) [1] instead nsca-ng. The fork provides additional to the normal nscaweb an authentication which depends to login _and_ hosts. nscaweb accept requests, check authentication and permission of the user and pass the passive data along to the icinga-command-pipe (icinga.cmd / icinga2.cmd). The configuration is easy and logging is good. Cheers nuts [1] https://github.com/iSchluff/nscaweb > thank you! > > ------ > Романеев Василий > Мобильный: +7-987-636-62-67 > skype romaneev > _______________________________________________ > icinga-users mailing list > icinga-users@lists.icinga.org > https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.icinga.org https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
