Steve Maybe you are right ?
Joe Reichman 170-10 73 rd ave Fresh meadows NY 11366 > On May 1, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It sure seems like QPAM would have been an obvious void that IBM could have > filled many decades ago -- but I for one would rather write a de-blocking > routine than an RFE. > > sas > >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:15 PM Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: >> >> You can't do a GET after a FIND because GET is a QSAM macro (MACRF=G) and >> FIND is a BPAM macro (MARF=RP). Deblocking is a facility of QSAM, not of >> BPAM or BSAM. You might submit an RFC to IBM for a Queued Partition Access >> Method, but you'll need a business case. >> >> >> -- >> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
