>Are you confusing an APAR fix ( a ++APAR) with a PTF >that fixes an APAR?
Quite possibly. I was likely thinking "PTF" even though the word "APAR" was used. You're right: we don't (as far as I recall seeing) PRE an APAR fix. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
