On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:19:28 -0400, John Eells <ee...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>What is the *smallest* volume size everyone sees in general use? > >For example, will we create any problems if we assume that "everyone" >has or can define at least a 3390-9 size volume these days? What if we >chose 3390-27? Apologies for being late to the party...to quote Reverend Jim, "ah...I've been busy!" Are you asking because you are considering a ServerPac change? We can carve out any size volume we need to, including EAV, though our Storage team prefers to keep to "standard" sizes (excepting EAV). We use and will likely retain m1 for Jes2 Checkpoint and Couple DS. m9 will be used for some system volumes (page, spool) on our small systems. We use m27 for SYSRES and DLIB today and will continue to do so until z/OS outgrows them. We use 2 m54 for SMP/E and other installation data, which we may eventually consolidate onto EAV. Regards, Art Gutowski General Motors, LLC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
