John McKown wrote: >> watch for long running sessions that started before the date in question >An excellent point!
Indeed, but let Hilario reply with more details. >This could greatly complicate things because z/OS doesn't generate a "STC xxxx >is still running" type SMF record. Sorry, with all respect, above is not true. You can get SMF record 30-2 'interval record' for loooooong running STCs and TSO. And also for batch jobs too... (Had to run a report to verify my claim about batch jobs...) >Especially subtype 2, which is an "interval" record and so comes out >periodically (as specified in the SMFPRMnn member). Yip, that is them! Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
