On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 22:11:35 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
>The ALLOCATE command is jusy another customer of DYNALLOC and it would
>make no sense to put a restriction there. Most allocations are done
>via DAIR or directly via DYNALLOC.
>
It's more complicated than that. Another opinion:
http://www2.marist.edu:8000/htbin/wlvtype?MVS-OE.54915
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:31:27 -0500
Reply-To: MVS OpenEdition <[email protected]>
From: William Schoen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: DYNAMNBR for z/OS UNIX Forked Procedure
BPXWDYN is not subject to DYNAMNBR. If I remember right, only allocations
that use the DALCNVRT TU or do not use DALPERMA TU are subject to this
limit. BPXWDYN always adds the DALPERMA TU.
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
