Paul Gilmartin wrote: >... and that BPXWDYN is exempt from the limit.
Where is that exemption documented? Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >The ALLOCATE command is jusy another customer of DYNALLOC and it would make no >sense to put a restriction there. Most allocations are done via DAIR or >directly via DYNALLOC. Indeed. Plus ISPF services which use IEBCOPY and friends under the covers. ALLOCATE or its variants are also 'customer' of DYNALLOC service. I agree that it makes no sense to put a restriction, but there is a max [combined] size of things like TIOT, DCB, etc in your address space for example. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
