> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 5:16 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: IKJ56220I max # of datasets reached > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:30:16 -0500, Tony Harminc wrote: > > >On 14 January 2015 at 17:18, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >> > >> >DYNAMNBR= on the EXEC card. > >> >ref: > >> >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=http://publibz.boulder.ib > >> >m.com/cgi- > bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/iea2b6a0/16.6&k=EWEYHnIvm0nsSxnW5y > >> > >9VIw%3D%3D%0A&r=j6Xa1Y0fbuP2mfgCQ5Zxhg%3D%3D%0A&m=x%2B2l5U > mcDlooWOnt > >> > >i2bv3QHlGhHpvdYhkDdSoLt9DiA%3D%0A&s=e5a1ec5728ce245451ef986024 > 0cbe77 > >> >7ba47a0821a69430a6706c9eaed28fd1 > >> > > >> Why is there even such a parameter? > >> > >> Why is its default not "infinity"? > > > (Of course, for interactive TSO it's probably hard-coded in the logon JCL, > which the user is not allowed to change. IKJEFT01 opened that door wide.) > > >It used to be worse: in MVT TSO you had to specify a > > > >//somename DD DYNAM > > > Did the names have to be different?
Never used this, before my time :) Could it be a concatenation :) > > >for each potential concurrent allocation. I wonder if that's still > >supported... > > > It is, "for compatibility". > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
