Hi all,

I think the simplest solution for an audit trail is z/OSMF 2.1. The WLM Policy 
Manager in z/OSMF keeps an audit trail of every change you make, AND keeps a 
history of previous definitions and policies. Whey create a new system when one 
already exists? You're going to need to go to z/OSMF at some point, so why not 
install it first for WLM? Users love WLM under z/OSMF. If you can wait for 2.1, 
it's best because there are more functions in 2.1, it uses far fewer resources, 
and is much easier to install. And now that there is no financial reason to 
delay moving to z/OS 2.1, I recommend that you go for it (see Cheryl's List 
#179). z/OS 2.1 has been in the field for a year and is a quite stable release.

I partly disagree with John, who said "I'm not holding my breath. z/OSMF is the 
way IBM is going because the money people in the most companies today don't 
seem to want experts, they want cheap labor. Like most of today's people who 
vote "good enough" instead of "excellent" with their wallets." Yes, z/OSMF is 
the way IBM is going, which means a requirement for a batch audit trail would 
likely be rejected (given that a function already exists). But the reason to go 
to z/OSMF is not because people want cheap labor, but because it's simply 
better (at least in 2.1). If I were a sysprog again, I would definitely prefer 
z/OSMF to do my standard tasks. I could get my work done more quickly, and with 
a better audit trail of who did what. The history function of z/OSMF is one of 
its strengths. Just because the tool is easier doesn't mean that you don't need 
experts. You still need to understand service classes, performance indicators, 
and much more. I personally think that z/OSMF reduces the manual effort to let 
you concentrate on more important matters.

Best regards,
Cheryl

======================
Cheryl Watson
Watson & Walker, Inc.
www.watsonwalker.com
cell & text: 941-266-6609
======================

On Nov 24, 2014, at 3:42 AM, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM 
<[email protected]> wrote:

John,

This is part of the process we are looking for: unload - batch modify - reload 
of a policy.

This tool does the reload (install) part. This is, together with unload, is the 
easiest part, it can be done online, because in the OP's and my situation, we 
have a running system.

What is lacking is the batch mass modify part.

Kees.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
Of John Eells
Sent: 20 November, 2014 15:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: WLM in batch?

(Reposting to the list server.)

A while back, when it became obvious that we needed a way to prime a WLM policy 
for new systems, SYS1.SAMPLIB(IWMINSTL) was born.  Maybe you'll find the 
IWMARIDU program useful in this context, and maybe not...if I recall correctly 
it uses an ISPF table.  (I actually helped work on this a long time ago...I've 
just forgotten the details, I'm afraid.)

[email protected] (John Compton) wrote:
> Currently, the only way I know of handling WLM policy changes is though the  
> > ISPF dialogs, screens, etc., that sit behind IWMARIN0. That's all very  > 
> well, but beyond the NOTES function (and/or in-house change control  > 
> documentation), there is no real possibility of an audit trail.
> 
> Is there any way of handling WLM policy processing in batch?
> 
<snip

--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[email protected]
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[email protected]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
********************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
********************************************************
                        


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to