In
<caajsdjh3gvsdewm25tn8qiwudxk+dxjbfbu3jxatpchskzn...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 11/20/2014
at 07:23 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
>Why? Because somebody thought that using ISPF would make it "better".
An *option* to use ISPF *does* make it better. However valuable the
ISPF panels may be, they don't eliminate the occasional need to
automate things.
>IBM wants z/OS to be "friendly".
They've turned down a lot of requirements that would have made it
friendlier. IBM wants things that will improve their cash flow,
possibly at the expense of long term profit.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
