On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:41:00 +0000, Martin Packer wrote: >I'm not a WLM developer. I'm hoping someone who is will answer that point. >If not we'll have to raise a requirement.
If you're raising a requirement, ask them why the hell it was architected like that in the first place. No doubt the answer will be "Broken-As-Designed". There has to be so much scope for improvement - straight xml would be fine; at least we could write stuff to massage it ourselves easily. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
