I'm totally confused. Why would it NOT be better to have a User Return Code that explains the single 0C1 or 0C4 (of which I've had so many, they are Oh-Chuck4's instead of the more formal Oh-Charlie4) or OC7 value. How is that less useful?
Barry Merrill -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 4:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Abend s0077 On Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:31:14 +0000, Blaicher, Christopher Y. wrote: >It blows me away that LE has to take a perfectly good 0C1, 0C4 or 0C7 and >convert it into a U4xxx code. Not only that, they have to obfuscate the >registers. I always assumed it was a specific design goal .... But I've largely managed to sidestep LE entanglements, so the pain has been minimal. So far. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
