On 09/05/14 13:19, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On 2014-09-05, at 10:33, Gibney, Dave wrote:
He can research the errors and possibly RESTORE those he just put on if they
sound like they cause aprolem he is likely to encounter,
I have once, perhaps twice, got in a situation where an attempt
to APPLY a defective, perhaps chimeric, PTF left the CSI so
damanged that an attempt to RESTORE failed. Subsequent attempts
to APPLY REDO failed because SMP/E noted that the RESTORE had
failed; further attempts to RESTORE failed because the PTF was
not recorded as APPLYed. I re-installed. But I'm not our
customer; we made the PTF right before it went to field.
No one has much noted my suggestion to inspect the Binder
SYSPRINT (SMP00040) for IEW####W messages, or have we got
beyond that point?
GIM30204E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI18572.
REQUIRED SYSMODS WERE
EXCLUDED.
GIM35905I PREREQUISITE SYSMOD UI16044 WAS EXCLUDED.
BYPASS(PRE) is not a solution; it usually makes things much
worse. As does BYPASS(MODID).
We have had competent customers review HOLDDATA comments;
conclude correctly that the documented introduced defect
was not relevant to their configurations; and APPLY
BYPASS(HOLDERR(aparnum)) beneficially. Be informed, and
be specific about the aparnum(s).
-- gil
That's why Systems Programming is as much an art as it is a science.
Knowing why you do things or even more importantly why you don't do
something, has to be learned from experience.
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
----
The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.
Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Australian Army Chief
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
