On 2014-09-05, at 10:33, Gibney, Dave wrote: > > He can research the errors and possibly RESTORE those he just put on if they > sound like they cause aprolem he is likely to encounter, > I have once, perhaps twice, got in a situation where an attempt to APPLY a defective, perhaps chimeric, PTF left the CSI so damanged that an attempt to RESTORE failed. Subsequent attempts to APPLY REDO failed because SMP/E noted that the RESTORE had failed; further attempts to RESTORE failed because the PTF was not recorded as APPLYed. I re-installed. But I'm not our customer; we made the PTF right before it went to field.
No one has much noted my suggestion to inspect the Binder SYSPRINT (SMP00040) for IEW####W messages, or have we got beyond that point? >>> GIM30204E ** APPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UI18572. >>> REQUIRED SYSMODS WERE >>> EXCLUDED. >>> GIM35905I PREREQUISITE SYSMOD UI16044 WAS EXCLUDED. BYPASS(PRE) is not a solution; it usually makes things much worse. As does BYPASS(MODID). We have had competent customers review HOLDDATA comments; conclude correctly that the documented introduced defect was not relevant to their configurations; and APPLY BYPASS(HOLDERR(aparnum)) beneficially. Be informed, and be specific about the aparnum(s). -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
