Oh!  I certainly didn't mean frequently throughout the day.  Just a few times a 
day.



>________________________________
> From: "Vernooij, CP - SPLXM" <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:53 AM
>Subject: Re: LLA/VLF -- NAMED LNKLST?
> 
>
>It depends on what you call frequently. Our IMS production libraries are LLA 
>controlled and updated at several slots a day, with an LLA update. I think 
>that if your libraries can be updated each second/minute by each linkedit job 
>that produces a new production module, this is a frequency which you don't 
>want LLA to follow up on.
>
>Kees.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
>Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
>Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 21:07
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: LLA/VLF -- NAMED LNKLST?
>
>Why would you hope that production libraries are not typically modified 
>frequently?  Our production application libraries are modified on a daily 
>basis, with one or more business application programs updated daily as the 
>business requires.
>
>Frank
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Peter Relson <[email protected]>
>>To: [email protected]
>>Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 2:07 PM
>>Subject: Re: LLA/VLF -- NAMED LNKLST?
>> 
>>
>>>you have the choice to either cache the directory or cache often used 
>>>loadmodules or do both. So if you have a number of frequently modified 
>>>members and a number of static and heavily used modules, you could get 
>>>the best of both worlds by not caching the directory and caching 
>>>frequently used load modules.
>>
>>Frequently modified production libraries is, I hope, somewhat atypical. 
>>Nevertheless, I would have said
>>-- you can cache the directory or not
>>Regardless, you get caching of often-used modules.
>>
>>And if you're willing to participate, you can get the best of both 
>>worlds by asking to cache the directory but notifying LLA when you have 
>>updated members. Refreshing all of LLA could be done; updating the 
>>entire library could be done. But both of those are overkill and will 
>>negatively affect performance.  Best is to use LLACOPY or MODIFY LLA to 
>>update its information about the specific updated modules.
>>
>>Note that it is intentional that LLA does not attempt to track 
>>automatically what has been updated and do something about it. Doing so 
>>could potentially cause application failures due to mismatched levels 
>>of modules.
>>
>>Peter Relson
>>z/OS Core Technology Design
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>>email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>>
>>
>>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
>[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>********************************************************
>For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
>http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
>and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
>addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
>be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
>e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
>received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
>e-mail, and delete this message. 
>
>Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
>employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
>this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
>Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
>Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
>33014286
>
>********************************************************
>            
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to