Peter Relson wrote: >Frequently modified production libraries is, I hope, somewhat atypical.
Indeed. I would do/allow that for testing purposes only. You want to play with modules, do that in your sandbox. >Note that it is intentional that LLA does not attempt to track automatically >what has been updated and do something about it. Doing so could potentially >cause application failures due to mismatched levels of modules. Indeed. Think of RACF and SMS. You do your changes and when finished + satisfied, you do your refresh. Oh, of course, I have locked up 'F LLA,REFRESH' in RACF and buried the keys for it. :-) Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
