The W Key stopped working this AM. Sorry for not catching it.
Ed
On Jan 6, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Aled Hughes wrote:
As so stated by Mr Gilmore, Ed's typo was obvious.
As to getting a reply, I have my doubts. Ed's comments about/to
Darren have often been rude, or as Elardus more politely put it:
I even don't know how they will reply to you in a friendly way... ;-)
Sorry Ed, but you need to lighten up or think about what/how you
write. The SysProgs of yore have long dropped their 'angry young
men' stance.
This Forum is thankfully a witness to that.
ALH
-----Original Message-----
From: John Gilmore <[email protected]>
To: IBM-MAIN <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 11:17
Subject: Re: Is the oner of IBM-Main still with us?
Here the onus probandi clearly falls on those who assert that the
owner of IBM-MAIN is defunct.
The only evidence for this notion yet adduced is that he has not
replied to an email message, and I do not find it persuasive: There
are days when I omit to reply to many such.
In passing, the [Latin] plural of 'onus' is 'onera', from which the
[English] adjective 'onerous' is derived in the usual way. [Latin
dropouts are of course free to use 'onuses' instead if they judge it
felicitous.] The form 'oner' has no standing.
John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
